Thumb_logo_white Discover Create Go Pro
Log In / Sign Up
Rss
Gashouse Live's Podcast
redefining : radio
Category: Alternative
Location:
Followers (13)
Currently following. Unfollow
25x25_4391350 Image_nophoto Image_nophoto 25x25_10320159 Picture?width=25&height=25 Picture?width=25&height=25 Image_nophoto 25x25_7300578 Image_nophoto Image_nophoto 25x25_10093100 25x25_7670725 Image_nophoto
100x100_9995214
Gashouse Radio is committed to bringing you a radio station done the right way. We blend independent music with mainstream musi...


by Gashouse Live
x
take it with you
Iphone5s_trans go mobile with PodOmatic's new iPhone app.
don't have an iPhone? no problem »
x
loading results... Loader
loading results... Loader
x
No results found.
March 31, 2015 12:53 PM PDT
itunes pic

The Random Hubiak joined us in studio. He stopped by to discuss his show this Easter Sunday at World Cafe Live.

We talked a little about his music, and he played a few songs as well. Excellent songwriter and piano player!

Tune in, and spread the word!

March 27, 2015 06:37 AM PDT

This was our Wednesday edition of Gashouse Live, which means tons of great music! Fox Bay, the current Band vs Band champion, faced south Jersey's The Narratus.

Both bands will be in regular rotation, because they are just that good, but which one will be back for another round of Band vs Band.

Tune in weekdays 6pm ET on www.gashouseradio.com/chat

March 25, 2015 10:38 AM PDT

Not usually a show about sports, tonight we talked a little bit about Pete Rose. With the new MLB commissioner coming in, another request t lift his band from the league has been issued. Should Pete Rose be allowed back into baseball?

Technology news saw some interesting advancements, including a product that blows away the iWatch. Check it out here:
https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=10153062100774526

The alien portion of the Scotch hour touched a little bit on our exploration of Mars, but what's really interesting is the next project using the Large Hadron Collider. Is it the end of the world?

March 24, 2015 11:12 AM PDT

Tonight's episode will focus on our Band vs Band segment, because it's a great one.

The DickVanDykes are out of Olney, MD. They're a pretty new band with a great sound. They've put together a nice little run here on Band v sBand and on this episode they try to keep that run alive. Stellarscope is a great band out of Philadelphia. While they've been in rotation for some time, they have a brand new album to add to the mix. Who's going to move on in Band vs Band after this epic battle?! Check it out, and visit these sites while you listen:

 

http://www.facebook.com/TheDickvandykes

http://stellarscopeband.com/

March 20, 2015 10:31 AM PDT

Singer-songwriter Pat Foran joined us in studio for an interview and acoustic session. For more information, visit patforanmusic.com

March 18, 2015 07:46 AM PDT

After WWII, the US and Soviet Union were the only 2 countries with any power and money left. So naturally we started to turn on each other. Capitalism vs Communism became the main narrative of the world. 
Some people believe that part of the reason we dropped the 2 nukes on Japan was obviously to end the war, but also to show the Soviet Union just what kind of power we held.
So America looked to make sure we created relationships all over the world in order to sell all of our goods to everyone [Capitalism]. The Soviet Union was hell bent on spreading Communism to countries around them in fear of Germany building up and invading once again (remember they still had the lunatic Stalin in charge who was in my opinion way worse than Hitler).
This is why we got involved in the Koren War and Vietnam as well, which we'll get into later. Basically it was to stop the spread of Communism.
Now with this history audit, we always "follow the money". So what was going on in this time period?
The Red Scare
Whether it was missile systems, military, technology, the space program, you name it, it became a pissing contest between the US and the Soviets. At the same time we were sending money to any country who may be influenced by Communism (like Greece Turkey, etc). All the while, the anti-communism propaganda machine began.
This also led to a bunch of government agencies being created, putting people into power that were not democratically elected, immune from government oversight, and also not adhering to our Constitution. The National Security Council, The Central Intelligence Agency, Atomic Energy Commission.
Start scaring the public with propaganda so that they will be in support of these unconstitutional moves, in order to keep us safe. Sounds very familiar to today. (Hide under your desk in case of a nuclear attack)! Government pushed Hollywood to make anti-communist movies designed to scare the public. CIA funded newspapers, magazines, TV shows, concerts, artists. 
Operation MOCKINGBIRD — The CIA begins recruiting American news organizations and journalists to become spies and disseminators of propaganda. The effort is headed by Frank Wisner, Allan Dulles, Richard Helms and Philip Graham. Graham is publisher of The Washington Post, which becomes a major CIA player. Eventually, the CIA’s media assets will include ABC, NBC, CBS, Time, Newsweek, Associated Press, United Press International, Reuters, Hearst Newspapers, Scripps-Howard, Copley News Service and more. By the CIA’s own admission, at least 25 organizations and 400 journalists will become CIA assets.
In 1947, Truman introduced the "Loyalty Review System". Government workers had to prove their loyalty if questioned about being a communist. How do you do that? By ratting out someone who you suspect might be a communist. How crazy is that? Its like a combination of the Patriot act and the Salem With Trials. 
Because Communism was looked at as "atheist", in 1954 Congress added "under God" to our pledge of allegiance. Another example of ignoring our founding fathers (separate religion and government). Also plans to increase social security, healthcare and minimum wage were all squashed because lobbyists (mainly the AMA) argued that they were socialist and therefore communist.
Government spending on education and science increased, mainly to try and one up the communists. Roads and infastructure blew up, mainly as escape routes in case of nuclear attack.
This began the arms race as well, a military build up. Again, our tax money was now being poured into the military industrial complex. Why? Because we had to fight this enemy that our TV and newspapers were telling us to be afraid of every second of every day. I'm not saying that we shouldn't have been careful with the Communists, but I never think it's ok to abandon our constitution and our democratic system out of fear and bullshit propaganda.

So our government was spending like crazy, and who was getting that money? Most of our deficit of today was built from our defense spending over the Cold War period. Bankers. Lending money to our government on interest. The Federal Reserve. The Rockefeller,s The Herrimans, The Rothschilds, JP Morfgan
Stalin took his instructions from Averell Harriman who spent 1944 & 1945 at Stalin's Kremlin headquarters.  (This Illuminati fixer had spent the pre-war years building up Hitler's war machine.) Stalin welcomed the external enemy to keep his own people in line. - See more at: http://www.henrymakow.com/the_cold_war_--_4_trillion_ill.html#sthash.p9uCtXm5.dpuf
Within 3 years of the atomic bombs, the soviets seemed to have nuclear technology of their own. This was due to spies.  This Cold War was all about intelligence, and covert operations. 
Operation MK-ULTRA — Inspired by North Korea’s brainwashing program, the CIA begins experiments on mind control. The most notorious part of this project involves giving LSD and other drugs to American subjects without their knowledge or against their will, causing several to commit suicide. However, the operation involves far more than this. Funded in part by the Rockefeller and Ford foundations, research includes propaganda, brainwashing, public relations, advertising, hypnosis, and other forms of suggestion.

Italy 1948 — The CIA corrupts democratic elections in Italy, where Italian communists threaten to win the elections. The CIA buys votes, broadcasts propaganda, threatens and beats up opposition leaders, and infiltrates and disrupts their organizations. It works -- the communists are defeated.
Iran 1953
Britain and it's colonies had no oil of it's own. They struck a long term, pretty shady deal with Iran so that all of Iran's oil was going to the British.
After the war, nationalist leaders in Iran became influential by seeking a reduction in long-term foreign interventions in their country—especially the oil concession which was very profitable for Britain and not very profitable to Iran. The British-controlled AIOC refused to allow its books to be audited to determine whether the Iranian government was being paid what had been promised. 
Iran basically takes back their oil, and then the US gets involved via the CIA. CIA overthrows the democratically elected Mohammed Mossadegh in a military coup, after he threatened to nationalize British oil. The CIA replaces him with a dictator, the Shah of Iran, whose secret police, SAVAK, is as brutal as the Gestapo. (for the sake of time I am simplifying this story a bit. I have links in the podcast description with more information on these events). This was the first successful government overthrow by the CIA.
Guatemala 1954 — CIA overthrows the democratically elected Jacob Arbenz in a military coup. Arbenz has threatened to nationalize the Rockefeller-owned United Fruit Company, in which CIA Director Allen Dulles also owns stock. Arbenz is replaced with a series of right-wing dictators whose bloodthirsty policies will kill over 100,000 Guatemalans in the next 40 years.
Haiti 1959 — The U.S. military helps "Papa Doc" Duvalier become dictator of Haiti. He creates his own private police force, the "Tonton Macoutes," who terrorize the population with machetes. They will kill over 100,000 during the Duvalier family reign. The U.S. does not protest their dismal human rights record.
The Bay of Pigs 1961 — The CIA sends 1,500 Cuban exiles to invade Castro’s Cuba. But "Operation Mongoose" fails, due to poor planning, security and backing. The planners had imagined that the invasion will spark a popular uprising against Castro -– which never happens. A promised American air strike also never occurs. This is the CIA’s first public setback, causing President Kennedy to fire CIA Director Allen Dulles.
The Dominican Republic and Equador in 1963 - CIA backed military coups to overthrow the gov't and put our own people in.
Indonesia and Zaire in 1965
Greece in 1967
Bolivia in 1968
Cambodia in 1972
Chile in 1973
http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/CIAtimeline.html

All of these were in the name of "spreading Democracy", but really its just to make sure the US gets what it wants from these countries. So when we look at the Middle East today, you have to understand that it is this policy that continues. The corporate media continue to push the idea that we're "fighting for freedom" and we fighting terrorists when really it's this same policy of taking over countries and taking their resources. It's wrong.

March 13, 2015 07:19 AM PDT

Long time drummer for Billy Joel and founder of The Slim Kings, Liberty DeVitto called in to the show. The Slim Kings have a show Friday night at Connie's Ric Rac. Liberty called in and shared some of his thoughts on the music industry today, and some stories from touring the world with Billy Joel.

We also had Carolyn Marie call in to the show. Carolyn has been extremely busy with her career. She has an EP on the way, and March 19th her single Take Back the Power will be released. Tune in and find out why this single is getting so much buzz.

http://www.carolynmariemusic.com/
http://www.slimkings.com

March 11, 2015 10:18 AM PDT

Co-host: Carly and Jon the Intern.

Carly is back! The Scotch Hour tradition continues on Tuesday nights. This time we were joined by Mike from the band Stealing Fame. Mike played a few acoustic songs and filled us in on the band.

Plus, we had our usual Tuesday night alien discussion, and a few other topics crept in there. This was also another attempt at our live Youtube feed, which is getting better and better!

March 10, 2015 07:47 AM PDT
Disclaimer:
  • It is important to note that Zionism and Judaism are completely separate. You don't have to be Jewish to be Zionist, and not all Jews are Zionist. 
  • It is ok to oppose the idea of "The State of Israel". Throughout recent history, if you opposed this idea, you were an anti-semite.
  • When we speak of "Jewish Zionists" we are speaking of the political movement, we are not speaking about the entire race or religion. This blurred line between politics and race/religion have made it near impossible to criticize Zionism.
 
Pre-World War
We can trace Zionism back way to the French Revolution and actually even earlier than that. Tonight we're focusing on political Zionism, because it is directly related the World Wars we just discussed, and to some of the problems in the Middle east today.
The "father" of political Zionism Theodore Herzl (1860-1904)
  • Dr. Herzl was an emancipated, secular journalist who was sent by his editor to Paris in 1894 to cover the Dreyfus affair. Dreyfus had been a captain in the French Army who was falsely accused and convicted of treason (although he was acquitted and completely cleared some years later). The case brought to light the strength of a strong streak of anti-Semitism prevalent in the upper echelons of the French Army
  • Herzl himself despaired of the whole idea of emancipation and integration and felt that the only solution to anti-Semitism lay in a Jewish Homeland. To that end he approached various diplomats and notables, including the Ottoman Sultan, but mainly European rulers, the great colonial powers of the time, and was rewarded for his efforts by being offered Argentina or Uganda by the British as possible Jewish Homelands.
  • In 1896 Theodor Herzl published Der Judenstaat (The Jewish State), in which he asserted that the solution to growing antisemitism in Europe (the so-called "Jewish Question") was to establish a Jewish state. In 1897, the Zionist Organisation was founded and the First Zionist Congress proclaimed its aim "to establish a home for the Jewish people in Palestine secured under public law."[61] However, Zionism was regarded with suspicion by the Ottoman rulers and was unable to make major progress.
  • A defining feature of Zionism was not the choice of Palestine, but the Zionists’ willingness to ally with European imperialism to achieve its goals. Herzl rejected the most progressive ideals of the 19th century–democracy, socialism, republicanism–and embraced the most reactionary– monarchy, nationalism, chauvinism, and racism. Zionism identified with the imperialist powers who carved up the globe, and accepted racist ideas about the "civilizing" virtues of colonization and "the white man’s burden" that made up the ideology of the capitalist class.
  • If one of the defining features of Zionism was its identification with imperial power, another was the way Herzl and founders of the movement viewed the very Jews they claimed to represent. The writings of Herzl and his colleague, Max Nordau, are littered with descriptions of European Jews as parasites, social diseases, germs, aliens. They were frustrated and bewildered that most Jews wanted to assimilate and live in their countries of birth. To these men who worshipped power and privilege, the desperate poverty of the Jews of Eastern Europe was a sign of weakness in the Jewish character.
  • To acquire the land for his state, Herzl was willing to beg from the table of every imperialist power, no matter how criminal. He courted them all–the German Kaiser, the Turks, the Russian Tsar, and the British Empire.

Zionism During World War I and II

There was already sympathy for the aims of Zionism in the British government, including the Prime Minister Lloyd George.[64] In late 1917, the British Army drove the Turks out of Southern Syria,[65] and the British foreign minister, Lord Balfour, sent a public letter to Lord Rothschild, a leading member of his party and leader of the Jewish community. The letter subsequently became known as the Balfour Declaration of 1917. It stated that the British Government "view[ed] with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people". The declaration provided the British government with a pretext for claiming and governing the country.[66] New Middle Eastern boundaries were decided by an agreement between British and French bureaucrats (remember from our WWI episode how all of Europe, North Africa, Russia and the Middle East were divided up). The agreement gave Britain control over what parties would begin to call "Palestine".

During World War I, most Jews supported the Germans because they were fighting the Russians who were regarded as the Jews' main enemy.[62] In Britain, the government sought American Jewish support for US intervention on Britain's behalf. They were losing to Germany and they needed help.
  • This is when the Jewish people turned on Germany and began aiding the British. This is one of the reasons Hitler had such a hatred or the Jews.
  • Many believe the only reason we got involved in WWI was so that Israel could have Palestine
From 1920 until 1939, hundreds of thousands of Jews immigrated to Palestine. Because of their "takeover" there were a handful of riots and conflicts between Palestinians and Jews.
  • With millions of Jews trying to leave Europe and every country in the world closed to Jewish migration, the British decided to close Palestine. The White Paper of 1939, recommended that an independent Palestine, governed jointly by Arabs and Jews, be established within 10 years. The White Paper agreed to allow 75,000 Jewish immigrants into Palestine over the period 1940–44, after which migration would require Arab approval. Both the Arab and Jewish leadership rejected the White Paper. In March 1940 the British High Commissioner for Palestine issued an edict banning Jews from purchasing land in 95% of Palestine. Jews now resorted to illegal immigration

Zionist officials were quite blunt in stating that they didn’t want all the refugees from Hitler’s Holocaust. They didn’t want the burden of absorbing millions of impoverished sick refugees who had no ideological passion for Palestine. The Agency only wanted young, healthy Jews who could come over and work and fight and build the state. As Israeli historian Tom Segev writes,
Urban life was, in their [Zionist leaders] eyes, a symptom of social and moral degeneration; returning to the land would give birth to the ‘new man’ they hoped to create in Palestine. In parceling out the immigration certificates, they therefore gave preference to those who could play a role in their program for building the country. They preferred healthy young Zionists.
The German Immigrants Association in Palestine actually complained in 1934 that the Zionist organizations in Berlin weren’t being selective enough about who they were sending. Its letter of complaint stated in part, ‘The human material coming from Germany is getting worse and worse." It even returned some of the refugees to Germany who they felt would be too much of a burden.
The Rescue Committee of the Jewish Agency wrote a private memorandum in 1943 about the prospects for their work. When this was written, it still could have been possible to save millions of Jews from Hitler’s "Final Solution." But they didn’t even try.
Whom to save: Should we help everyone in need, without regard to the quality of the people? Should we not give this activity a Zionist-national character and try foremost to save those who can be of use to the Land of Israel and to Jewry? I understand that it seems cruel to put the question in this form, but unfortunately we must state that if we are able to save only 10,000 people from among 50,000 who can contribute to build the country…as against saving a million Jews who will be a burden, or at best an apathetic element, we must restrain ourselves and save the 10,000 that can be saved from among the 50,000–despite the accusations and pleas of a million."
Was this position unethical? To paraphrase Jabotinsky, this was their ethic–there was no other ethic. To the Zionists, the needs of the Jewish State came first, second, and last.


In an effort to win independence, Zionists now waged a guerrilla war against the British. The main underground Jewish militia, the Haganah, formed an alliance called the Jewish Resistance Movement with the Etzel and Stern Gang to fight the British. In June 1946, following instances of Jewish sabotage, the British launched Operation Agatha, arresting 2700 Jews, including the leadership of the Jewish Agency, whose headquarters were raided. 

The Rothschilds funded the early European settlers in Israel, manipulated events in Germany that led to the horrific treatment of Jewish people and others, and then used that as the excuse to reach their long-term goal - a Rothschild-Illuminati stronghold in Palestine using the Jewish population as fodder to be used and abused as necessary. 
  • THE HOUSE OF ROTHSCHILD began their multi-million dollar investment in the Zionist state of Israel in 1882 in order to preserve their control over the Suez Canal and future water rights.
  • Overall goal would be to completely control the Middle East. The natural resources, and the passageway between Europe and Asia.


In the U.S., Congress criticized British handling of the situation and delayed loans that were vital to British post-war recovery. By 1947 the Labour Government was ready to refer the Palestine problem to the newly created United Nations.
  • The majority report of the UN proposed[95] "an independent Arab State, an independent Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem" ..., the last to be under "an International Trusteeship System".[96] On November 29, 1947, in Resolution 181 (II), the General Assembly adopted the majority report of UN, but with slight modifications.[97] The Plan also called for the British to allow "substantial" Jewish migration by 1 February 1948.[98]
  • Neither Britain nor the UN Security Council took any action to implement the resolution and Britain continued detaining Jews attempting to enter Palestine. Concerned that partition would severely damage Anglo-Arab relations, Britain denied UN representatives access to Palestine during the period between the adoption of Resolution 181 (II) and the termination of the British Mandate.[99] The British withdrawal was finally completed in May 1948.
  • Immediately following the declaration of the new state, both superpower leaders, U.S. President Harry S. Truman and Soviet leader Joseph Stalin, recognized the new state. The Arab League members Egypt, Transjordan, Syria, Lebanon and Iraq refused to accept the UN partition plan and proclaimed the right of self-determination for the Arabs across the whole of Palestine. The Arab states marched their forces into what had, until the previous day, been the British Mandate for Palestine, starting the first Arab–Israeli War

The United States Gets Involved with Zionism

The importance of the United States to this movement was recognized from early on. One of the founders of political Zionism, Max Nordau, wrote a few years after the Basle conference, "Zionism's only hope is the Jews of America."[11]

At that time, however, and for decades after, the large majority of Jewish Americans were not Zionists. In fact, many actively opposed Zionism. In the coming years, however, Zionists were to woo them assiduously with every means at hand and the extent to which Nordau's hope was eventually realized is indicated by the statement by a prominent author on Jewish history, Naomi Cohen, writing in 2003, "but for the financial support and political pressure of American Jews... Israel might not have been born in 1948."[12]
By the early 1890s organizations promoting Zionism existed in New York, Chicago, Baltimore, Milwaukee, Boston, Philadelphia, and Cleveland.

By 1914 several additional Zionist groups had formed, including Hadassah, the women's Zionist organization.[22] By 1918 there were 200,000 Zionists in the U.S., and by 1948 this had grown to almost a million. [23]
Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, has spoken with blunt exasperation about the Jewish-Israeli hold on the United States: [19]

“I've never seen a President -- I don't care who he is -- stand up to them [the Israelis]. It just boggles the mind. They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wasn't writing any­thing down. If the American people understood what a grip those people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms. Our citizens certainly don't have any idea what goes on.”

Today the danger has never been greater. Israel and Jewish organiza­tions are prodding the United States into new wars against Israel's­enemies.

To sum up: Jews wield immense power and influence in the United States. The “Jewish lobby” is a decisive factor in US support for Israel. Jewish-Zionist interests are not identical to American in­terests. In fact, they often conflict.

As long as the “very powerful” Jewish lobby remains entrenched, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US polit­ical system and the American media, the Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the bloody con­flict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.


Zionism in the U.S. Today

Over the last 20 years, the U.S. has been slowly phasing out economic aid to Israel and gradually replacing it with increased military aid. In 2007, the Bush Administration and the Israeli government agreed to a 10-year, $30 billion military aid package FY 2009 to FY 2018. In 2012, the U.S. began giving Israel $3.1 billion a year (or an average of $8.5 million a day) and promised to provide that amount every year through FY 2018.
  • $0 given to Palestine
  • Contrary to ordinary U.S. policy, Israel has been and continues to be allowed to use approximately 25% of this military aid to purchase equipment from Israeli manufacturers. According to CRS, “no other recipient of U.S. military assistance has been granted this benefit.” Thanks in part to this indirect U.S. subsidy, Israel’s arms industry has become one of the strongest in the world. “Between 2001 and 2008, it was the 7th largest arms supplier to the world with sales worth a total of 9.9 billion.”
  • from 1949 through 2014 is $121 billion.
Pro-Israel Lobby gives millions to political campaigns each year
  • The “Jewish lobby” is a decisive factor in US support for Israel. Jewish-Zionist interests are not identical to American in­terests. In fact, they often conflict.
  • As long as the “very powerful” Jewish lobby remains entrenched, there will be no end to the Jewish-Zionist domination of the US polit­ical system and the American media, the Zionist oppression of Palestinians, the Israeli threat to peace, and the bloody con­flict between Jews and non-Jews in the Middle East.
  • The issue of support for Israel [by a candidate] has proven capable of spurring a sizable portion of Jews to switch parties—in large enough numbers to tip the scales in national or statewide elections. Moreover, the "Israel swing vote" is especially open to political courtship because, unlike the interests of other minority groups, support for Israel has long been compatible with traditional Republican and Democratic agendas. ... On the other hand, being distinctively unsupportive of Israel can significantly hurt a candidate's chances."
  • State-of-the art Israeli jets, paid for by the United States, bomb civilian targets in this tragic, poverty-stricken wasteland which acts as a holding camp for the human beings the Israeli government would rather be dead. Waiting in the wings are Israeli tanks preparing for a possible ground invasion of Gaza, again paid for by the United States. 
  • Forty years of polling has consistently shown that Americans support Israel in its conflict with the Arabs. ... Both Israel and America were founded by refugees from European religious intolerance; both are rooted in a common religious tradition; Israel is a lively democracy in a part of the world that lacks democracy; Israelis seem self-reliant in the manner of American pioneers; and Israel's enemies, in many cases, seem to be America's enemies as well.
On June 8th, 1967, Israel attacked the USS Liberty
  • The combined air and sea attack killed 34 crew members (naval officers, seamen, two Marines, and one civilian), wounded 171 crew members, and severely damaged the ship.
  • Israel apologized for the attack, saying that the USS Liberty had been attacked in error after being mistaken for an Egyptian ship.[6] Both the Israeli and U.S. governments conducted inquiries and issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate
  • False Flag attempt to get the US to attack Israel's enemy Egypt.
The Obama government is going to be slavishly pro-Israel because he needed the sanction of the truly massive Zionist lobby in the United States to secure the presidency. His vice-president, Joe Biden, is a long-time bag-carrier for Israel. He said on Israeli television: 'I am a Zionist - you don't have to be a Jew to be a Zionist'. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is another Israel puppetess who pledged to 'obliterate' Iran if it launched a nuclear attack on God's chosen country.  

List of Zionists in our Political system today: https://realitybloger.wordpress.com/2010/08/29/zionism-101-the-zionist-israeli-government-of-the-united-states-of-amerika/
March 05, 2015 09:26 AM PST

It's one hour Wednesday, and that usually means a focus on the music. Tonight we continued our regular segment f Band vs Band. The returning champion, Taeko McCarroll, faced new challenger A Crucifying Feeling.

Something happened on this episode that is very unusual. Check it out, and be sure to tune in live every weeknight at 6pm ET only on www.gashouseradio.com!

loading more... Loader
 
x

take it with you


Iphone_trans Listening to podcasts on your mobile devices is extremely convenient -- and it's what makes the podcasting medium so powerful.

You can take your favorite shows and mixes with you anywhere, but to do so requires some quick and simple steps.

Let's walk you through that process together.
step 1:


Click the "Subscribe With iTunes" link in the page's sidebar:

Subscribe_with_itunes

This will require that you have the iTunes software on your computer.

(You can download iTunes here.)
step 2:
Itunes_ss

Now that you've subscribed to the podcast on iTunes, the feed will display in your "Podcasts" section on the left navigation bar.

Click there and you'll see the show displayed in the iTunes browser.

You can "get all" to download all available episodes or just individual episodes.
step 3:


Plug your mobile device (iPhone, iPad, iPod) into your computer with the Dock Connector cable, and click the device in iTunes's left navigation bar.

Itunes_ss2

Once you have your device highlighted, click "Podcasts" in the top navigation bar and sync the podcasts you want on your device. Click "apply" and the episodes you have downloaded on your iTunes software will sync with your device.
that's it!

The beauty of this process is that now, every new episode of your subscribed podcasts will automatically sync to your device every time you plug it in and open iTunes. You can now take your favorite shows with you everywhere you go.

Enjoy!
done!
x

share this podcast


Email a friend about this podcast
x

subscribe to this podcast

Rss-icon RSS
Itunes-icon iTunes